LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  February 2016

CODE4LIB February 2016

Subject:

Re: Don't Change Your Site Because of Reference Librarians RE: [CODE4LIB] Responsive website question

From:

Katherine Deibel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:54:45 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (133 lines)

I'm more of a

hisssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Kate Deibel, PhD | Web Applications Specialist
Information Technology Services
University of Washington Libraries
http://staff.washington.edu/deibel

--

"When Thor shows up, it's always deus ex machina."

On 2016-02-08 5:40 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
> I have long held the following opinion on zoom control directives:
>
> Grrrrrr
>
>
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Haitz, Lisa (haitzlm) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> In the case of the original question, with regard to  <http://langsdale.ubalt.edu>
>> This code is on the web site:
>> <meta name="viewport"
>>             content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0"/>
>>
>>
>> In my experience, I thought having the max-scale value would affect accessibility, by breaking the zoom function.??
>>
>> http://a11yproject.com/posts/never-use-maximum-scale/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon
>> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 12:11 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Don't Change Your Site Because of Reference Librarians RE: [CODE4LIB] Responsive website question
>>
>> This is less a matter of site behavior that it is an issue with how the zoom feature works. I agree that zoom should work as you describe, but it won’t work that way if the browser is sending the wrong message regarding the viewport. The viewport should not change when the page is zoomed in on. I think that most users would expect that zooming would enlarge a protion of the viewport, and that is what it should do.
>>
>> Cary
>>
>> Cary Gordon, MLS
>> The Cherry Hill Company
>> http://chillco.com
>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Katherine Deibel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When people zoom in (e.g., CTRL+), they aren't actually *zooming in* insomuch as making the viewport smaller. The viewport is the keystone to the media query magic that makes websites responsive. When it is smaller, like for your phone, then it presents a different layout.
>>>
>>> Because yes, that is exactly what users are expecting when they use a feature called zoom. Content and layout change too in other applications like Word, PDF readers, etc. when you zoom in and out... oh wait... they don't.
>>>
>>> Nope. I would argue that most users believe zoom works like zoom in other applications and would not talk about the technical aspects of how responsiveness and concepts like view ports.
>>>
>>>  From a disability accessibility perspective, magnification is not purely about text readability but making sure that all features of a website---images, interactive widgets, text, etc.---are of use to the user. Merely changing the font size is like putting out a fire in the kitchen while the rest of the house is ablaze.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kate Deibel, PhD | Web Applications Specialist Information Technology
>>> Services University of Washington Libraries
>>> http://staff.washington.edu/deibel
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> "When Thor shows up, it's always deus ex machina."
>>>
>>> On 2016-02-08 7:18 AM, Michael Schofield wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Chiming in. Kyle asked
>>>>
>>>>> The reference librarians frequently zoom in on our homepage during class instruction, and have noticed that after they zoom in a bit, our homepage switches from desktop to the mobile layout. Is there any easy way around this?  In other words, is it possible to fix the site so that, if a user is on a desktop/laptop, zooming in on the homepage will *not* flip the user over to the mobile layout?
>>>>
>>>> This is actually the normal and expected behavior of responsive websites. Otherwise breaking this zoom would make the content less accessible, but perhaps a workaround would be to add a font size toggle in the header of the website where users can increase or decrease just the font size. Since I read you were using jQuery, check out this code that does what I described really neatly: http://codepen.io/ianfarb/pen/sxbvk .
>>>>
>>>> When people zoom in (e.g., CTRL+), they aren't actually *zooming in* insomuch as making the viewport smaller. The viewport is the keystone to the media query magic that makes websites responsive. When it is smaller, like for your phone, then it presents a different layout.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I really wanted to comment to warn against making changes like this to your website because of library-specific use cases - e.g., someone, staff or stakeholder, complains. These don't reflect the use cases of your patronbase.
>>>>
>>>> The reference librarians can change the default font size of their
>>>> browsers. I would make them google that, rather than seek to break
>>>> the zoom. For starters, here is how you go about it in Chrome.
>>>> http://www.ehow.com/how_10035444_change-text-size-color-google.html
>>>>
>>>> Good question!
>>>>
>>>> Michael Schofield
>>>> www.libux.co / @schoeyfield / www.webforlibraries.com
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>>>> Of Katherine N. Deibel
>>>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 2:43 PM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Responsive website question
>>>>
>>>> This is actually a really good question as it gets into an
>>>> interesting tension between responsiveness and accessibility. Zooming
>>>> is often a useful means of addressing visual access issues, and one
>>>> cannot presume that a user will have external or in-browser apps for magnification.
>>>>
>>>> There is some literature on defining media queries using em/rem units
>>>> instead of pixels, which would address some of the issues.
>>>> http://blog.cloudfour.com/the-ems-have-it-proportional-media-queries-
>>>> ftw/ https://css-tricks.com/zooming-squishes/
>>>>
>>>> I can't say for certain about this, however, as I haven't tested it yet.
>>>> I have now added zooming vs responsiveness to my testing criteria.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kate Deibel, PhD | Web Applications Specialist Information Technology
>>>> Services University of Washington Libraries
>>>> http://staff.washington.edu/deibel
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> "When Thor shows up, it's always deus ex machina."
>>>>
>>>> On 2/5/2016 10:40 AM, Kyle Breneman wrote:
>>>>> Happy Friday, everybody!
>>>>>
>>>>> Our library recently got a shiny new, responsive-esque website.
>>>>> <http://langsdale.ubalt.edu>  The reference librarians frequently
>>>>> zoom in on our homepage during class instruction, and have noticed
>>>>> that after they zoom in a bit, our homepage switches from desktop to the mobile layout.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any easy way around this?  In other words, is it possible
>>>>> to fix the site so that, if a user is on a desktop/laptop, zooming
>>>>> in on the homepage will *not* flip the user over to the mobile layout?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>>>
>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager