LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  March 2016

CODE4LIB March 2016

Subject:

Re: Public Health Metadata

From:

Kyle Banerjee <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:45:29 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (123 lines)

Howdy Jacob,

One thing you'll want to consider in choosing a vocabulary is to find one
that's optimized for purposes/topics similar to yours.

For example, SNOMED is designed to provide standardized terminology for
storing/retrieving information from clinical care EHRs, ICD-10 is for
reporting out for statistical purposes, and MeSH was designed for indexing
articles, books, documents, etc in the life sciences. There are other
vocabularies designed for other uses.

These three schemes all have hierarchical and/or synthetic codes in the
background (with ICD-10, the codes are actually in the foreground with the
vocab in the background) that lend themselves towards relating concepts in
an internationalized database of resources in many languages -- SNOMED
specifically has an international version. There are good tools for these
schemes (you'll even find ones that assign terms based on textual
analysis), and it's easy to get the data so you can create your own tools
if needed.

If the idea is that that the values of Target Populations are kept separate
from Technical Area and Expertise Area? If so, you might consider using
more than one vocabulary or even to use your own hierarchy. For example,
you may find that no vocabulary expresses Target Population the way you
need and there probably few enough terms that it would be feasible to
maintain your own hierarchy for that area.

kyle

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Jacob Ratliff <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> All good questions, and most of which we are still in the process of
> determining. The types of documents are generally project related
> documentation (reports, plans, technical information, etc.), but those have
> not yet been standardized. We are also in the process of doing business
> analysis and user testing to determine the types and amount of metadata we
> need. I just know for sure that we will need "subject" or "topic"
> descriptors for all of the content. This has currently been narrowed down
> to "Technical Area" (i.e. the actual health issue), target populations
> (e.g. Newborns), and Expertise Areas (e.g. Monitoring and evaluation), but
> all of that is subject to change based on research and user testing.
>
> As for the process to assign terms and the structure of the terms, all of
> that is up in the air right now as we have no systems (business or
> technological) to implement any of this. In an ideal world flush with
> resources, I would be able to get a metadata/vocabulary management tool, as
> well as a robust document/content management system that can work together,
> as well as integrate with our other data and business intelligence systems
> that are being created. There are currently a number of evaluative/business
> analysis workstreams moving forward to try and answer some of these
> questions. In reality, there is a very good chance a lot of this will need
> to be managed through excel and good governance.
>
> The systems and vocabularies will also have to useful worldwide, as 80% of
> our employees are located outside of the US (we aren't even talking about
> multiple languages right now; that's a problem that is not even worth
> considering at this point).
>
> The suggestions everyone has given so far are very helpful and are putting
> me on the right track. My hope is to be able to use one of them, or at
> least part(s) of them to get to where we need to go.
>
> Hopefully in a few months I will have a good update (and more questions) on
> where we are!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacob
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Kyle Banerjee <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Could you say a bit more about the documents you need to manage, the
> level
> > of specificity you need, how they'll be used, and what process you
> envision
> > to assign terms? If your documents are mostly clinical in nature, SNOMED
> > strikes me a good choice, but if you want terminology that could take you
> > to related articles in PubMed or your needs aren't mostly clinical, MeSH
> > might work better.
> >
> > It's possible to crosswalk across vocabularies, but the different
> > vocabularies are optimized to support different needs so you'll want to
> > pick one that's appropriate for your use.
> >
> > kyle
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jacob Ratliff <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I currently work in an International public health non-profit, and we
> are
> > > setting up enterprise wide document management for dealing with
> Knowledge
> > > Management and Information Management issues. Lots of moving pieces,
> but
> > I
> > > wanted to get some input on metadata specific to the medical/health
> > world.
> > > I am looking for some metadata guidance specifically related to the
> > > medical/health world. Is anyone using any standard controlled
> > vocabularies?
> > > Should I be looking into Linked Data? I'm starting off the research
> phase
> > > for all of the metadata, so links to resources and case studies is
> > greatly
> > > helpful!
> > >
> > > Bonus points to anything that is international in scope, as over 75% of
> > > the employees at my company are non-US based (most of them in Africa).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jacob Ratliff
> > > Information Architect / UX Specialsit
> > > Management Sciences for Health
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > >
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager