I've tried the wget command and curl and in both cases I just get the
HTML version of the document. I don't think any meaningful content
negotiation is happening. It's probably as Karen suspected: they didn't
return and embed schema in older reviews. Are you getting something else?
I think the tool Karen is using takes the URL as the identifier
(logical) and converts the '<meta name=description ' tag into
schema:description (which seems fair). That's how the tools comes up
with the little bit it does for this item.
p.s. Curl command I used:
curl -L -H 'Application/rdf+xml'
http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2014/2014-02-18.html | grep schema
I tried a few variations, such as removing the .html from the end of the
URL etc. Nada.
On 03/31/2016 08:39 AM, Brian Kennison wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Kevin Ford <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> FWIW, I'm looking at the HTML itself. You may be using a tool that is
> generating a little but of schema. Is that accurate?
> I was perplexed by this also but I realized that there was “content negotiation” going on. I set the header to accept rdf and indeed there is data for this document.
> wget --header "Accept: application/rdf+xml" http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2014/2014-02-18.html