I think it's quite likely that we will have at least one proposal for 2017
-- perhaps more. I don't think we need to worry about 2017.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Brian Rogers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Agreed on the wording. Because, while at this point I'm guessing we'll be
> able to find a physical home for 2017... if per chance that doesn't
> happen... the rollover money from last year's conference presumably has to
> go somewhere, in the interim.