LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  July 2016

CODE4LIB July 2016

Subject:

Code4Lib Journal Issue 33 is now available!

From:

Ron PETERSON <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:51:23 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (139 lines)

The Code4Lib Journal, Issue 33 is now available!

http://journal.code4lib.org/issues/issue33

The Editorial Committee is pleased to submit issue 33 for your summer
reading pleasure. We encourage you to explore this issue, engage in the
comments, and reach out to the authors that contributed their work.

Editorial Introduction – Summer Reading List
by Ron Peterson
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11859
New additions for your summer reading list!

Emflix – Gone Baby Gone
by Netanel Ganin
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11762
Enthusiasm is no replacement for experience. This article describes a tool
developed at the Emerson College Library by an eager but overzealous
cataloger. Attempting to enhance media-discovery in a familiar and
intuitive way, he created a browseable and searchable Netflix-style
interface. Though it may have been an interesting idea, many of the crucial
steps that are involved in this kind of high-concept work were neglected.
This article will explore and explain why the tool ultimately has not been
maintained or updated, and what should have been done differently to ensure
its legacy and continued use.

Introduction to Text Mining with R for Information Professionals
by Monica Maceli
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11626
The ‘tm: Text Mining Package’ in the open source statistical software R has
made text analysis techniques easily accessible to both novice and expert
practitioners, providing useful ways of analyzing and understanding large,
unstructured datasets. Such an approach can yield many benefits to
information professionals, particularly those involved in text-heavy
research projects. This article will discuss the functionality and
possibilities of text mining, as well as the basic setup necessary for
novice R users to employ the RStudio integrated development environment
(IDE). Common use cases, such as analyzing a corpus of text documents or
spreadsheet text data, will be covered, as well as the text mining tools
for calculating term frequency, term correlations, clustering, creating
wordclouds, and plotting.

Data for Decision Making: Tracking Your Library’s Needs With TrackRef
by Michael Carlozzi
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11740
Library services must adapt to changing patron needs. These adaptations
should be data-driven. This paper reports on the use of TrackRef, an open
source and free web program for managing reference statistics.

Are games a viable solution to crowdsourcing improvements to faulty OCR? –
The Purposeful Gaming and BHL experience
by Max J. Seidman; Dr. Mary Flanagan;Trish Rose-Sandler; Mike Lichtenberg
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11781
The Missouri Botanical Garden and partners from Dartmouth, Harvard, the New
York Botanical Garden, and Cornell recently wrapped up a project funded by
IMLS called Purposeful Gaming and BHL: engaging the public in improving and
enhancing access to digital texts (
http://biodivlib.wikispaces.com/Purposeful+Gaming). The goals of the
project were to significantly improve access to digital texts through the
applicability of purposeful gaming for the completion of data enhancement
tasks needed for content found within the Biodiversity Heritage Library
(BHL). This article will share our approach in terms of game design choices
and the use of algorithms for verifying the quality of inputs from players
as well as challenges related to transcriptions and marketing. We will
conclude by giving an answer to the question of whether games are a
successful tool for analyzing and improving digital outputs from OCR and
whether we recommend their uptake by libraries and other cultural heritage
institutions.

From Digital Commons to OCLC: A Tailored Approach for Harvesting and
Transforming ETD Metadata into High-Quality Records
by Marielle Veve
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11676
The library literature contains many examples of automated and
semi-automated approaches to harvest electronic theses and dissertations
(ETD) metadata from institutional repositories (IR) to the Online Computer
Library Center (OCLC). However, most of these approaches could not be
implemented with the institutional repository software Digital Commons
because of various reasons including proprietary schema incompatibilities
and high level programming expertise requirements our institution did not
want to pursue. Only one semi-automated approach was found in the library
literature which met our requirements for implementation, and even though
it catered to the particular needs of the DSpace IR, it could be
implemented to other IR software if further customizations were applied.
The following paper presents an extension of this semi-automated approach
originally created by Deng and Reese, but customized and adapted to address
the particular needs of the Digital Commons community and updated to
integrate the latest Resource Description & Access (RDA) content standards
for ETDs. Advantages and disadvantages of this workflow are discussed and
presented as well.

Checking the identity of entities by machine algorithms: the next step to
the Hungarian National Namespace
by Zsolt Bánki, Tibor Mészáros, Márton Németh, András Simon
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11765
The redundancy of entities coming from different sources caused problems
during the building of the personal name authorities for the Petőfi Museum
of Literature. It was a top priority to cleanse and unite classificatory
records which have different data content but pertain to the same person
without losing any data. As a first step in 2013, we found identities in
approximately 80,000 name records so we merged the data content of these
records. In the second phase a much more complicated algorithm had to be
applied to show these identities. We cleansed the database by uniting
approximately 36,000 records. The workflow for automatic detection of
authority data tries to follow human intelligence. The database scripts
normalize and examine about 20 kinds of data elements according to
information about dates, localities, occupation and name variations. The
result of creating pairs from the database authority records, as potential
redundant elements, was a graph, which was condensed to a tree, by human
efforts of the curators of the museum. With this, the limit of
technological identification was reached. For further data cleansing human
intelligence that can be assisted by computerized regular monitoring is
needed, based upon the developed algorithm. As a result, the service
containing about 620,000 authority name records will be an indispensable
foundation to the establishment of the National Name Authorities. This
article shows the work process of unification.

Metadata Analytics, Visualization, and Optimization: Experiments in
statistical analysis of the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA)
by Corey A. Harper
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11752
This paper presents the concepts of metadata assessment and
“quantification” and describes preliminary research results applying these
concepts to metadata from the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA). The
introductory sections provide a technical outline of data pre-processing,
and propose visualization techniques that can help us understand metadata
characteristics in a given context. Example visualizations are shown and
discussed, leading up to the use of “metadata fingerprints” — D3 Star Plots
— to summarize metadata characteristics across multiple fields for
arbitrary groupings of resources. Fingerprints are shown comparing metadata
characterisics for different DPLA “Hubs” and also for used versus not used
resources based on Google Analytics “pageview” counts. The closing sections
introduce the concept of metadata optimization and explore the use of
machine learning techniques to optimize metadata in the context of
large-scale metadata aggregators like DPLA. Various statistical models are
used to predict whether a particular DPLA item is used based only on its
metadata. The article concludes with a discussion of the broad potential
for machine learning and data science in libraries, academic institutions,
and cultural heritage.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager