I do create content for the wiki, but only in the role of community foot soldier. This is how I discovered that it had moved to Semantic MediaWiki.

It does look easy to use, but it will be inconsistent and fairly meaningless until somebody foists a policy on us.

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Frank Guerino <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Cary,
> 
> Yes, I took a look and saw that Code4Lib uses the semantic version of
> MediaWiki.  Are you involved in it’s content creation and, if so, how useful
> do you believe the use of its semantic tagging features to be?  In other
> words, are they easy to use and are they worth the extra work that has to be
> put into adding and maintaining them?
> 
> Frank
> —
> Frank Guerino, Managing Partner
> The International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT)
> http://www.if4it.com
> 1.908.294.5191 (M)
> 
> 
> On 1/27/17, 11:35 AM, "Cary Gordon" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> The Code4lib wiki <https://wiki.code4lib.org/> is a semantic wiki.
>> 
>> AFAIK, this has not been widely publicized, and the community has not
>> established any policy for its content integration.
>> 
>> Cary
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:08 AM Frank Guerino <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> The article ³Semantic Wikis ­ Pros and Cons
>>> <http://www.if4it.com/semantic-wikis-pros-cons/> ² talks about the ability
>>> to tag content with metadata (meta-tagging).  Are any of you using Semantic
>>> Wikis with your Library infrastructure(s)?  If so, what are your opinions
>>> of
>>> them?  If not, how are you handling meta-tagging?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Frank
>>> ‹
>>> Frank Guerino, Managing Partner
>>> The International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT)
>>> http://www.if4it.com
>>> 1.908.294.5191 (M)
>>> 
>> -- 
>> Cary Gordon
>> The Cherry Hill Company
>> http://chillco.com
>>