I would also like to see a vote on this sooner rather than later. The committee has done a great job looking into the various possibilities, and I would hate to see momentum stall out on this again.

It seems that it is not quite as simple as just saying "we want a sponsor" or "we would like to incorporate", but that there are also options within those preferences to choose from. Maybe we could do something like a ranked preference vote?

I suspect that there will be differences of opinion on which incorporation/sponsorship option is best, but I think that more or less everyone agrees the status quo is untenable. 

Regards,
Karl Holten
LAMP Administrator- Library and L&S IT Office, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julie Swierczek
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 2:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Fiscal Continuity IG report redux [silence has been deafening]

Could we roll out the Diebold-a-tron just to get a sense of where people stand on this?  I, too, am in favor of the DLF/CLIR sponsorship, but it would be nice to see if the group has a strong preference in one direction or another.

Can we vote on the three options, and possibly also allow for people to input comments as part of their votes?

Julie

Julie C. Swierczek
Librarian for Primary Resources and Metadata Services Swarthmore College Peace Collection and Friends Historical Library [log in to unmask]