There is also the publisher association's Resource Access for the 21st Century (RA21) effort: https://ra21.org/
On Aug 9, 2017, 4:29 PM -0400, Tim McGeary <[log in to unmask]>, wrote:
> This has been and will continue to be a topic for CNI, and there is a brief
> report that CNI published in 2016 that may be a good place to start:
> Tim McGeary
> AUL for Information Technology Services
> Duke University
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Tod Olson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Most of the larger content providers and other service providers do
> > support SSO. Smaller content or service providers, not so often. Since
> > you're in the U.S., check the list of participants in the InCommon
> > Federation, which is the federation for higher education in the U.S.:
> > https://www.incommon.org/participants/.
> > We've had increasing difficulty keeping proxy server configurations
> > working as time goes on, web applications become more complex, and browsers
> > become more strict in various ways.
> > We're not ready to get rid of the proxy server yet, there's a combination
> > of non-Shibboleth vendors and campus culture to consider, but I look
> > forward to that day!
> > -Tod
> > Tod Olson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > Systems Librarian
> > Interim Director for Integrated Library Systems
> > University of Chicago Library
> > On Aug 9, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Pennington, Buddy D. <[log in to unmask]
> > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> > Do vendors even directly support SSO? We use SSO to enable users to
> > authenticate into EZProxy for IP-based access to our electronic resources.
> > I didn't think cutting out EZProxy and just going with SSO was an option.
> > Buddy Pennington
> > Director of Information Technology and Strategy
> > University of Missouri--Kansas City
> > Miller Nichols Library
> > 800 East 51st St.
> > Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
> > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > 816-235-1548
> > UMKC Libraries
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Jimmy Ghaphery
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 2:36 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Wanted: Good overview article comparing new
> > authentication/access control options (Shibboleth, OpenAthens, SAML, etc.)?
> > I'll second Bethany's point on many smaller vendors just now moving to IP
> > authentication. If it consoles campus IT tell them they are right....it has
> > been at least 10 years since I have been hearing that proxy servers are a
> > thing of the past, but that the working normal across most libraries is
> > IP/proxy authentication.
> > Best,
> > Jimmy
> > ----------------------------------------
> > Jimmy Ghaphery
> > Associate University Librarian for Scholarly Communications and Publishing
> > VCU Libraries
> > 804-827-3551
> > ORCID: 0000-0001-8043-7701 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-7701
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Goodwin, Bethany <[log in to unmask]
> > wrote:
> > I'd be interested in hearing any feedback as well. Some of my vendors
> > are smaller and we're lucky to have IP authentication with ezproxy.
> > Bethany
> > Bethany Goodwin
> > Electronic Resources Librarian
> > Rolfing Memorial Library | Trinity International University
> > 2065 Half Day Road, Deerfield, IL 60015 [log in to unmask] |
> > 847-317-4006
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cynthia Harper <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hi - Can anyone provide some good documents on current trends in
> > alternatives to proxy servers? My campus is looking into Single Sign-On
> > for the first time, and the campus technical people believe that
> > proxy servers are a thing of the past, but I don't know whether all
> > of our vendors will be able to support an alternative method.
> > Thanks for your help.
> > Cindy
> Tim McGeary
> [log in to unmask]
> GTalk/Yahoo/Skype/Twitter: timmcgeary
> 484-294-7660 (Google Voice)