LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  October 2017

CODE4LIB October 2017

Subject:

Re: Lightweight IR infrastructure

From:

Matt Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:17:02 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (190 lines)

I don't have more to add than the other great points already mentioned, but
I am confused how you are having so much trouble with DSpace. I manage our
DSpace repository with only a singular systems librarian who works on
supporting all our systems and we have had minimal trouble with DSpace.  We
haven't modified it much so it is largely out of the box.  Plus our
institution is only about 6,000, which is half of what you guys have.  So
I'm confused how you are having so much trouble with it.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Aaron Collier <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> > The technology needed for an IR is
> pretty simple: a place to put files, a way to discover files, a way to
> submit files, a way to describe files. It's the kind of thing that a
> university's in-house IT department could put together pretty easily with
> some web forms.
>
>
> While certainly true on the surface, I think the real issue is going to be
> the maintainability and sustainability of such a project that is
> essentially already solved with a platform like DSpace. Rolling your own,
> in such a piecemeal way is likely to introduce loads of uncertain
> complexity.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jason Bengtson <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > Yes and no. Certainly a lot of work has been done in separating the
> layers
> > of activity/service so that stacks could be built that would be uniquely
> > useful to a particular organization. Here at K-State we've done a little
> > investigating of using blacklight as our presentation layer and having it
> > interact with DSpace through its extremely useful RESTful API, but given
> > our other workload we haven't had much time to pursue that. We're seeing
> > variations on Blacklight, Hydra, and Fedora based stacks out there . . .
> I
> > haven't worked with those tools but I'd like to. However, all of these
> > approaches still seem to bundle a particular set of services together as
> an
> > IR. As others have pointed out, that certainly isn't essential, at least
> > hypothetically, as long as those services are served to users in a way
> that
> > either brands them together relatively seamlessly, or delivers the
> overall
> > service set of an IR successfully through other modalities.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > *Jason Bengtson*
> >
> >
> > *http://www.jasonbengtson.com/ <http://www.jasonbengtson.com/>*
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Josh Welker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > To your knowledge, have any libraries approached IR as a set of
> services
> > > divorced from a particular software platform? In my albeit limited
> > > experience, the IR and the platform used to host the IR are used almost
> > > synonymously. That is perhaps a barrier to entry for smaller libraries
> > who
> > > could do the service work of collecting objects, creating metadata,
> etc,
> > > but do not have the resources to invest in DSpace or Digital Commons.
> > >
> > > Joshua Welker
> > > Information Technology Librarian
> > > James C. Kirkpatrick Library
> > > University of Central Missouri
> > > Warrensburg, MO 64093
> > > JCKL 2260
> > > 660.543.8022
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Jason Bengtson <
> [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Josh,
> > > >
> > > > If you have funds (or you anticipate saving enough funds by ending
> > local
> > > > dspace support), a SAAS platform like what Tom suggests is worth
> > > > considering, so it's worthwhile to throw contentDM into the mix. I'll
> > be
> > > > honest; I never cared for it (the platform lacked flexibility to me),
> > but
> > > > we had it at one library I've worked at, and, if your needs are
> modest,
> > > it
> > > > might meet them. It's completely hosted, so the local hosting
> overhead
> > is
> > > > eliminated. There's also Digital Commons, although I've also found
> them
> > > too
> > > > limited for my uses in the past, and since their recent change in
> > > ownership
> > > > I would regard them dubiously. The thing I would be most careful
> with,
> > > for
> > > > both of those products, would be having a plan in place to migrate
> your
> > > > data out of them should circumstances change. I've heard of some
> > > challenges
> > > > on that front in Digital Commons (although I have no direct
> experience
> > in
> > > > that area, and things may have improved since I heard that feedback),
> > and
> > > > I'm not sure what the migration options look like in contentDM.
> > > >
> > > > Here at K-State we use DSpace, but we host our instance on Amazon Web
> > > > Services rather than through local physical or virtual boxes. My
> > systems
> > > > folks have been very happy with this move, which, while keeping us in
> > > full
> > > > control of our boxes, has eased some aspects of their management and
> > > > provided us with enhanced reliability.
> > > >
> > > > All that having been said, I really like what you, Jonathan, and Tom
> > have
> > > > said about looking at looking at an IR as a set of services and
> > > > 'interrogating' what that means and how those services might be
> > > delivered.
> > > > I think we, as a profession, need to do that for a variety of
> products,
> > > > including IRs and catalogs.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > *Jason Bengtson*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *http://www.jasonbengtson.com/ <http://www.jasonbengtson.com/>*
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Josh Welker <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We're a mid-sized university library (10,000 fte) trying to get an
> IR
> > > off
> > > > > the ground to showcase student and faculty research. We've had a
> > DSpace
> > > > > instance running for several years, but we use so few of its
> features
> > > > that
> > > > > DSpace ends up being more trouble than it is worth. In particular,
> > it's
> > > > > very frustrating to deal with metadata editing, file management,
> the
> > > > Handle
> > > > > URL system, and HTML/CSS theming.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am considering leaving the DSpace model in favor of our "IR" just
> > > > being a
> > > > > glorified FTP site that MARC records in our catalog can point to. I
> > > might
> > > > > even build a tiny frontend using some scripting language to add IP
> > > > > authentication, URL redirect stuff, or a Google Scholar interface,
> > but
> > > > > that's really it. No metadata modelling, no preservation features,
> no
> > > > > indexing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have experience using a very small, file-based (as
> > opposed
> > > to
> > > > > database-driven) application as a foundation for an IR? Are there
> any
> > > > > problems I should anticipate?
> > > > >
> > > > > Joshua Welker
> > > > > Information Technology Librarian
> > > > > James C. Kirkpatrick Library
> > > > > University of Central Missouri
> > > > > Warrensburg, MO 64093
> > > > > JCKL 2260
> > > > > 660.543.8022
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager