LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  December 2017

CODE4LIB December 2017

Subject:

Re: Systems Librarian / software developer

From:

Tom Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:51:11 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

> But a lot of cracking good ideas from libraries, and the broader field of Information Science are also not making their way into development in the way that they should.

I think that this is an important point. As a community, we've learned
the value of using outside software. However we haven't learned the
value of outsiders using our software.

We are solving problems everyone has. How to organize information, how
to preserve it long-term, how to find and utilize it... These aren't
library specific problems. So why isn't the rest of the world looking
to us for solutions?

I would love for us to start seeing value in having others look to us
for answers. To do so we would have to dumb things down a bit and also
venture outside. We might have to give up on artisanal data. Doing so
could provide great gains. Forced compromise would keep our tech
honest. Plus the outside world has massive budgets and armies of
staff.

Libraries and librarians have been stewarding information for
thousands of years. We are uniquely positioned to provide guidance in
the information age. It's worrying to see the world move by without
us.

To me, the most compelling counter-examples are Internet Archive and
public free libraries. There is so much more potential to engage with
the larger tech community.

</bloviating>

Tom #rant4lib Hutchinson

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Bengtson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In terms of their ability to thrive, it really depends on the person. When
> I got moved into an Emerging Technologies Librarian position, I had
> virtually no CS or sysadmin background. But I was given space to learn and
> experiment and I went out and found the knowledge I needed. I worked on
> projects of my own conception and design, and built increasingly complex
> things. When I needed more elbow room, I set it up for myself, and learned
> something about systems administration in the process. Make no mistake, I
> have no illusions about being the sharpest person around. Libraries need to
> create space, be flexible with boundaries, and embrace mixed modalities
> that stretch across the information spectrum. My Information Science
> interests and training are as much a part of my development as immersion in
> programming languages and development modalities. Too many academic
> libraries that I've worked for, or worked with, were pathologically unable
> to break out of anachronistic patterns which lead them nowhere. I agree
> with Tom about modern development not making it into libraries. But a lot
> of cracking good ideas from libraries, and the broader field of Information
> Science are also not making their way into development in the way that they
> should. If libraries want to be real academic units they need to explore
> new academic ground, at the intersection of these concepts, much more
> vigorously, and work to provide the space needed for the field and the
> discipline to evolve.
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Jason Bengtson*
>
>
> *http://www.jasonbengtson.com/ <http://www.jasonbengtson.com/>*
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Sarah Weissman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> As one of these rare weirdos who is a software developer with an MLS, my
>> opinion from looking at jobs in the field is that one major barrier to
>> hiring developers into librarian positions is salary. I got my MLS after
>> having worked as a developer for a while, and after I finished my degree,
>> the amount of money I could make as a developer even in a non-profit
>> library/archives setting was significantly more than I could make in an
>> entry level librarian position. (For example, Glassdoor lists average base
>> pay for a software developer as $81,994 while average base pay for a
>> systems librarian is $55,664.) So, while I would have loved to be an
>> official “librarian,” I wound up not applying for any positions with that
>> title.
>>
>> It may be possible to find someone right out of school with a CS degree
>> and an MLS who has no work experience and is looking for an entry level
>> developer or librarian position, although I have never met anyone who took
>> this academic path. Also, this person would probably not thrive as a
>> software developer unless they were part of a larger team with more
>> experienced developers.
>>
>> -Sarah
>>
>> On 12/7/17, 2:02 PM, "Code for Libraries on behalf of Edward Iglesias" <
>> [log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>     Sometimes you get lucky as I did when I got two developers as
>>     interns/student workers.  If you need someone in that position I would
>> say
>>     put it in the job requirements.  There are MLS librarians with CS
>>     undergrads or developer experience.  They are just few and far between.
>>     I've also seen Systems postions that work with or supervise developer
>>     positions.  Sometimes you can get away with outsourcing the
>> development and
>>     having the internal Systems person act as a liaison/PM.
>>
>>     Edward Iglesias
>>
>>     On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Samson, Bob <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>     > I have a question regarding staff development and I am hoping
>> someone can
>>     > provide some advice.  I have two vacant librarian positions in my
>> Library
>>     > Systems department.  I need to fill those vacancies with
>> software/systems
>>     > developers in order to move our initiatives forward.  We have
>> encountered
>>     > reluctance on the part of our human resources to repurpose those
>> librarian
>>     > positions into developer positions.
>>     >
>>     > Has anyone had success in posting Systems Librarian positions using
>>     > education and experience requirements consistent with software
>> developers?
>>     > We have sufficient flexibility in hiring librarians, but the skill
>> sets
>>     > differ significantly between librarians and developers.  Ideally, we
>> would
>>     > want someone with backgrounds in computer science rather than library
>>     > science, for example.  I'm curious to know if anyone has tried this
>> and
>>     > been successful.
>>     >
>>     > Bob Samson
>>     > Head of Library Systems & Technology
>>     > University of Texas at Arlington
>>     >
>>
>>
>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager