If we can find any clients that actually make use of embedded JSON-LD, I'd
look at how they would treat it. If we can't, then i guess that says
something.

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Lovins <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Dear community,
>
> We have a project underway at NYU called "Enhanced Networked
> Monographs" [1] that uses topic maps [2] to merge back-of-book indexes
> from about 100 open-access monographs, provides an editorial interface
> through a Topic Curation Toolkit, and provides a user interface
> through the Readium ebook platform.
>
> We are using JSON-LD and Web Annotation for modeling the topic map,
> and annotating topic pages accordingly.
>
> We wanted to ask this group if it make sense to embed limited JSON-LD
> into our topic webpages (e.g. at a URL such as
> https://enm.dlib.nyu.edu/topic/2938) and then provide a full JSON-LD
> record (at a URL such as https://enm.dlib.nyu.edu/data/2938/ld+json),
> as shown in our examples [3].
>
> It seems reasonable to us based on the content negotiation principles
> described in the W3C's "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web [4], but we'd
> like to know if there are other considerations to be aware of.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Daniel
>
>
> [1] https://wp.nyu.edu/enmproject/
>
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic_map
>
> [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bbn0iCiRUNoULnOB9f46dYZfBS6yl
> 5OKbXp6SVz-Jas/edit
>
> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/#r303uri
>
> --
> Daniel Lovins
> Head of Knowledge Access, Design & Development
> Knowledge Access & Resource Management Services
> New York University, Division of Libraries
> 20 Cooper Square, 3rd floor (311)
> New York, NY 10003-7112
> [log in to unmask]
> 212-998-2489
>