But... first sentence - in bold- states that they are not getting rid of customer support for stand alone EzProxy- and that is reiterated throughout the communication. Your highlighted portion mentions sales alone.

I read this as, if new libraries want EZProxy, they can get it- just hosted. For those of us who already have it as a stand alone- no worries, they will continue to support.

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Leonard
Assistant Dean, Information Technologies and Collections Services
Seton Hall University
400 South Orange Avenue
South Orange, NJ 07079
973-761-9445
Preferred pronouns: She, her, hers

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Kun Lin
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 1:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] RA21/ seamlessaccess.org

Source is OCLC's announcement at EZProxy listserves
[image: oclc.JPG]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Hammer, Erich F <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> They are!?  When?  Source?
>
> We're just now looking at testing SSO/SeamlessAccess with some of our 
> largest vendors, but we have no illusions that we will be able to use 
> it for all of them.  Several of the OpenAthens presenters at ER&L last 
> week made no bones about needing to keep EZProxy for edge cases.
>
> Erich
>
>
> On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 13:15, Kun Lin eloquently inscribed:
>
> > Since OCLC is going to discontinue standalone EZProxy, anyone has 
> > tried RA21/seamlessaccess?  Is it still just open to publisher so far?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Kun
>
>
>
** WARNING: This email originated from outside of Seton Hall University. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. **