For handle, if you are using hdl.handle.net domain, you have to maintain
the handle server for it to resolve. But if you are using your own domain
name, it's very easy to write a script for URL redirect. This is the reason
I insisted on using our domain name instead of hdl.handle.net
However, handle.net organization did tell me before that they are open to
the idea of a customized 404 page for organization that moved away from
handle and decommissioned their handle server.
Kun Lin
-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Peter Murray
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 2:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Moving away from handle service
If it were me, I’d write a script that fills an S3 bucket with HTML files
containing
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="time; URL=new_url" />
...and nice body content that points users to handle destination. Then throw
a CloudFront distribution in front of it, change the DNS, and call it a day.
You’ll spend a couple bucks a month for storage and bandwidth, but the
ultimate control stays with the institution.
Peter
On Mar 1, 2021, 5:19 PM -0500, Stuart A. Yeates <[log in to unmask]>, wrote:
> My institution has used handles for more than a decade and would like
> to stop (non-standard ports, special server, etc), particularly as
> we're now committed to DOIs.
>
> However, we don't want to break URLs.
>
> Does anyone know of a third party service that we can hand a list of
> handle-to-URL-mappings and walk away? Preferably with a single upfront
> payment rather than on-going cost.
>
> cheers
> stuart
> --
> ...let us be heard from red core to black sky
|