LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  November 2022

CODE4LIB November 2022

Subject:

Re: ProQuest TDM? Alternatives? Open source alternatives?

From:

Amy Kirchhoff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:26:35 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (183 lines)

Hi David, Eric ~



I'm going to step in and offer a few clarifying comments about Constellate (https://constellate.org/, that JSTOR affiliated service Eric mentions!)



We are similar to say ProQuest's TDM Studio or Gales' Digital Scholar Lab in that we have a user interface for building datasets (with some visualizations) and a cloud based compute environment.  However, our model is a little different.  Constellate allows anyone in the world to build datasets of content and download them -- you do not need to participate in Constellate or have a subscription to the original content.  Content in Constellate is designated as either rights restricted or open.  When rights restricted data is included in a dataset, that dataset only includes non-consumptive data, whereas for open content, the dataset also includes the full-text.  Over 3 million documents in Constellate from JSTOR, Portico, and third party resources are open.  We also have a carve out for JSTOR rights restricted content, whereby after a formal request review, we will package that full-text up for researchers. These services are not part of our subscription service and are available to anyone.  You can read more both about what content is included and what its permissions<https://constellate.org/docs/data-sources> are and our dataset options<https://constellate.org/docs/dataset-options>.   We currently limit datasets to 25,000 for not participants, but we are happy to help folks who need more content (most don't, however) and we are working to change the UI limit to a larger number (probably around 200,000 - it'll be the size above which the files simply become too big for most people.)  We don't get a lot of requests for larger datasets, so it hasn't become enough of a priority to bump our other to do list items.

Our primary focus is on teaching and learning - which is the real benefit of a Constellate subscription.  We believe that the ability to read, understand and communicate data as information is one of the most essential skills for the future of education and employment. Because of that, we sought to build a text analysis program that enables every librarian and faculty members in all disciplines to teach these skills. Constellate combines the content and tools users need to perform text analysis alongside a defined curriculum and robust tutorials, live classes taught by text analysis experts, and an inspiring and supportive community of users.  Our participants get to send their community members to our classes<https://constellate.org/events/constellate-class-intermediate-python> and use Constellate (including the cloud based compute environment) to teach!  We don't actually see much research happening in the Constellate Lab.  As Eric said, most researchers want to do that work locally in their own environments.



If you'd like to learn more about Constellate or have questions, just let me know!



~ Amy


--
Amy J. Kirchhoff (she/her)
Constellate<https://constellate.org/> Business Manager / Portico, JSTOR
Twitter: @AmyPlusFour

Take your research further with text and data analysis skills!





-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Eric Lease Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 9:06 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] ProQuest TDM? Alternatives? Open source alternatives?



>>>>>Caution: This message did not originate from within ITHAKA's email

>>>>>system. Please use caution when opening attachments and following

>>>>>links within this message.<<<<<



On Nov 21, 2022, at 5:12 PM, RD B <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:



> We (Kelvin Smith Library, Case Western Reserve University) are

> considering the ProQuest TDM Studio:

>

>   https://about.proquest.com/en/products-services/TDM-Studio/

>

> I was curious if anyone here had any direct experience with the system

> they could share, or if there were alternatives that the community

> recommends and why.

>

> --

> R. David Beales - [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> - 732-299-0390 Library, Earth,

> Sol System, Orion-Cygnus Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy, Laniakea

> Supercluster





A couple of years ago I experimented with TDM Studio, and I can report that it worked as advertised.



More specifically, Studio worked like the handful of similar services. One from Lexis/Nexus, one from JSTOR, and the one from the HathiTrust. What does that mean? It means a person:



  1. searches the given collection

  2. results are subsetted to a secure location

  3. using tools and APIs provided by the vendor,

     analysis is done against the results

  4. results are exported

  5. repeat until done



Many times the tools and API require a working knowledge of the Python programming language, and then there is the curve of learning the specific tools. The tools usually include a number of modeling techniques: bibliography creation, ngram analysis, topic modeling, and full text searching. After working in this area for a more than a few years now, these techniques ought to be considered rudimentary, and additional techniques such as the application of grammars, semantic indexing, and collocations ought to be included.



All of the vendors have their hands tied by contract and copyright. Each vendor has made agreements with publishers not to freely share content, but it is not possible to do text mining, natural language processing, nor data science with words sans the content. Consequently each vendor implements a variation on Step #2, above. The process would be a h3ll of a lot easier if the student, researcher, or scholar could:



  1. search content

  2. select items of interest

  3. download selected items sans click,

     save, click, save, click, save, etc.

  4. use a wide variety of GUI tools,

     command-line tools, or programming

     languages to do the analysis



Here licensing is probably the limiting factor, not copyright.



Do I know of open source alternatives? No, not really, but I hope my Reader addresses some of these problems. Given a set of files of just about any number and just about any ilk and saved in a local folder/directory, the Reader:



  * converts the files to plain text

  * does all sorts of feature extraction against the result

  * distills the features into a data set (a "study carrel")

  * provides the means to compute against the data set, and

    the computing could done with GUI tools (like OpenRefine

    or AntConc), command-line tools (like grep or jq), or

    programming libraries (like Python's NLTK or spaCy)



In the end the Reader supports all of the modeling techniques alluded to above as well as a few others. Consequently, a person can search any vendor for content of interest, download the results (through click, click, click), and do analysis against the result.



Like all software, the Reader is never done and ought to be considered beta-ware, See:



  https://distantreader.org



HTH



P.S. David, nice signature.



--

Eric Lease Morgan

Navari Family Center for Digital Scholarship Hesburgh Libraries University of Notre Dame



574/631-8604

https://cds.library.nd.edu

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager