LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  January 2024

CODE4LIB January 2024

Subject:

Re: Text analysis for MARC data?

From:

Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:09:12 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

On Jan 4, 2024, at 11:26 AM, Alison Clemens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Has anyone here done text analysis-type work on MARC data, particularly on
> topical subject headings? I work closely with my library's digital
> collections, and I am interested in seeing what kinds of topics (as
> indicated in our descriptive data) are represented in our
> digital collections. So, I have the corresponding MARCXML for the
> materials and have extracted the 650s as a string (e.g., *650 $a World War,
> 1914-1918 $x Territorial questions $v Maps*), but I'm a little stuck on how
> to meaningfully analyze the data. I tried feeding the data into Voyant, but
> I think it's too large of a corpus to run properly there, and regardless,
> the MARC data is (of course) delimited in a specific way.
> 
> Any / all perspectives or experience would be welcome -- please do get in
> touch directly (at [log in to unmask]), if you'd like.
> 
> --
> Alison Clemens
> Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University


The amount of available content, relative to the size of the values in 6xx, is kinda small. The number of things might be large, but the number of result words is small. That said, I can think of a number of ways such analysis can be done. The process can be boiled down to four very broad steps:

  1) articulating more thoroughly what questions you want to ask of the MARC
  2) distilling the MARC into one or more formats amenable to a given modeling/analysis process
  3) modeling/analyzing the data
  4) evaluating the results

For example, suppose you simply wanted to know the frequency of each FAST subject heading. I would loop through each 6xx field in each MARC, extract the given subjects, parse the values into FAST headings, and output the result to a file. You will then have file looking something like this:

  United States
  World War, 1914-1918
  Directories
  Science, Ancient
  Maps
  Librarians
  Origami
  Science, Ancient
  Origami
  Maps
  Philosophy
  Dickens, Charles
  World War, 1914-1918
  Territorial questions
  Maps

Suppose the file is named headings.txt. You can then sort the list, use the Linux uniq command to count and tabulate each heading. Pipe the result to the sort command, and you will end up a with groovy frequency list. The command will look something like this:

  cat headings.txt | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Here is the result:

   3 Maps
   2 Science, Ancient
   2 Origami
   1 World War, 1914-1918
   1 Territorial questions
   1 Philosophy
   1 Librarians
   1 Directories
   1 Dickens, Charles

Such a process will give you one view of your data. Relatively quick and easy.

Suppose you wanted to extract latent themes from the content of MARC 6xx. This is sometimes called "topic modeling", and MALLET is the grandaddy of topic modeling tools. Loop through each 6xx field of your MARC records, extract the headings, and for each MARC, create a plain text file containing the data. In the end you will thousands of tiny plain text files. You can then turn MALLET against the files, and the result will a set of weighted themes -- "topics". For extra credit, consider adding the values of 245, 1xx, 5xx to your output. If each plain text file is associated with a metadata value (such as date, collection, format, etc.), then the resulting topic model can be pivoted, and you will be able to observe how the topics compare to the metadata values. For example, you could answer the question, "For items in these formats, what are the more frequent topics?" or "How have our subjects ebbed & flowed over time?"

I do this sort of work all the time; what you are describing is a very large part of my job. Here in our scholarship center people bring me lots o' content, and I use processes very much like the ones outlined above to help the people use & understand it.

Fun!

--
Eric Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
Navari Family Center for Digital Scholarship
University of Notre Dame

574/631-8604

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager