LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  May 2024

CODE4LIB May 2024

Subject:

Re: rag - retrieval-augmented generation

From:

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 12 May 2024 08:41:33 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (198 lines)

I wish we would just call it "lying". Hallucinations can be delightful, 
or scary, but what these do is simply lying. Hallucinations are sensory, 
not data driven. I think the term was used by the LLM people to make it 
seem less like a huge mistake and more like a twinkle in the eye.

They are LYING.

kc

On 5/8/24 10:43 AM, Lee, Seong Heon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree. Hallucination seems big deal in adopting LLMs for research. I don’t see a perfect answer for this issue yet although AI engineers work hard to resolve it for future technology. I know that they use ‘temperature’ to control the degree of AI’s creativity, so that they determine how much AI responses are grounded on the user-provided documents.
>
> However with this limitation, LLMs are widely accepted as a research assistant. This is legit even though they do not guarantee 100% fact check. In my opinion, it is like that faculty get help from research assistants. Faculty is still responsibility to verify all contents of their own writing. But employing research assistants will certainly boost their work, especially in the beginning stage.
>
> Seong Heon Lee
>
> From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Lena G. Bohman <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 10:10 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] rag - retrieval-augmented generation
> External Message
>
>
> Hi all,
> I think this thread is highlighting that the main issue with using LLMs in library work is hallucinations. My impression is that at this point no one really knows how to correct that flaw, and since our work requires a high level of accuracy/truth, it really is a fatal flaw in our field.
>
> I am constantly telling researchers that they cannot use LLM for research where they cannot independently fact check the results. This makes them far less attractive to my researchers, since they really want LLMs to be able to do things they can't already do themselves...
>
> Lena
>
> Lena Bohman
> Senior Data Management and Research Impact Librarian
> Long Island Jewish - Forest Hills Liaison
> Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
> [cid:cbe21533-1efd-4b3a-9506-1ed4e834a004]
> ________________________________
> From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 12:57 PM
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] rag - retrieval-augmented generation
>
> EXTERNAL MESSAGE
>
> Dear Eric
>
> Thanks for bringing the RAG pipeline to the attention of the community. I
> actually came to know about it from your earlier post on RAG dated March 1,
> 2024, and was trying to play with a RAG pipeline by using all open source
> tools like LlamaIndex-based PrivateGPT, Qdarnt as a vector database, and
> open source LLMs like mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q4_K_M.gguf (as quantized
> GGUF formatted models are more friendly for a CPU-based system like my
> laptop), Orca, etc.
>
> Today I tried with the journal articles you referred to in your earlier
> post and using in your current system (around 135 articles, mainly from CRL
> and ITAL) to upload, index, and retrieve them in my local RAG pipeline. And
> then came a very thought-provoking post from Simon critically studying this
> new RAG system, which actually came into existence to reduce two big issues
> of LLM, like hallucinations and out-of-date non-contextual responses. It
> seems hallucination is an inherent feature of LLM, even when contextualized
> through a RAG pipeline.
>
> However, one interesting point to be mentioned here is the effect of prompt
> engineering on a RAG pipeline. When I ask the same questions as Simon did
> on the same set of documents in a similar kind of pipeline with prompt
> engineering, the result shows some differences (see additional system
> prompt in the snapshot):
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> Regards
>
> Parthasarathi
>
> Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
>
> Professor, Department of Library and Information Science,
>
> University of Kalyani, Kalyani - 741 235 (WB), India
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:07 PM Eric Lease Morgan <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On May 8, 2024, at 11:20 AM, Simon Hunt <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> I thought you might be interested in a few tests I tried out- they reveal
>>> some interesting hallucinations and misalignment of expectations. Of
>>> course, I don't know the content of the 136 articles you used, so this
>>> might also demonstrate how the chatbot attempts to answer questions that
>>> fall outside of scope.
>>>
>>> My input:
>>>
>>>> Please recommend three recent articles that discuss how to catalog
>> musical
>>>> scores.
>>> It confidently gave me three articles that don't exist (that is, based on
>>> searching my own library catalog and Google Scholar), from three authors
>>> that don't exist (as far as I could tell), then provided four references
>>> that have nothing to do with cataloging musical scores.
>>>
>>> In a new session, I tried a more controversial topic:
>>>
>>>> List the ways that current classification systems reflect a culture of
>>>> white supremacy
>>> The answer suggests that it self-censored due to the sensitive topic (I
>>> assume there are guardrails behind the scenes). The titles and
>> publication
>>> dates of the references, while real, suggest to me that they aren't
>> likely
>>> to contain much information on the topic of white supremacy in
>>> classification systems (though again, without knowing the sources you
>> used,
>>> they might represent the closest matches).Finally, as a follow-up in the
>> same session, I asked
>>>> What are the most recent articles on the topic of classification and
>> white
>>>> supremacy?
>>> Like the first answer, the reply is decent, but if the articles
>> referenced
>>> below it actually discuss what the answer claims, the titles sure don't
>>> suggest it. The bot also loves the article *Cataloging Theory in Search
>> of
>>> Graph Theory and Other Ivory Towers* -- it also referenced that in a
>>> colleague's question about subject headings.
>>>
>>> In short, it seems like the effect RAG is having is to provide real
>>> articles as references, but it isn't clear how/if those articles have any
>>> content that lines up with the chatbot's output.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon Hunt
>>> Director, Automation, Indexing & Metadata
>>
>> Simon, thank you for the feedback, and my short reply is, "Yes!"
>>
>> There are many characteristics going into the process of indexing
>> ("vectorizing") a collection and then providing a generative-AI inteface
>> against the index. Some of them include:
>>
>>    * creating a collection - What set of content is to be queried? In this
>> case, I created a collection of 136 articles on cataloging.
>>
>>   * curating the collection - This mean providing some context, and I
>> provided authors, titltes, dates, and file names. Curating the collection
>> really helps when it comes to addressing questions and supporting
>> information literacy issues.
>>
>>   * indexing - This is the process of vectorizing each document and caching
>> the result. This process can be accomplished through the use of a model or
>> through the use of a tradtional database. The process is not trivial.
>>
>>   * prompt engineering - On the surface, these chatbots seem to take
>> anything as input, but under the hood the inputs are reformulated to create
>> "prompts". Different models use different prompts. Many of the mis-steps
>> outlined above could be avoided by better prompt engineering on my part.
>>
>>   * generation - My demonstrations use a model called Llama2 to formulate
>> the response. Other models are better at generating structured data like
>> JSON, CSV, etc. Other models are better at outputing software -- Python
>> scripts. I believe the results of my demonsdtration would be better if I
>> were to use ChatGPT, but I'm unwilling to spend the money; I like open
>> source software and making sure everything is computed locally, not
>> remotely.
>>
>> Alignment? RAG works like this:
>>
>>    1. vectorize ("index") content
>>    2. get query and vectorize it too
>>    3. identify content having a similar vector as the query
>>    4. give the generating model (ex: Llama2) both the query
>>       as well as the similar content to create the response,
>>       and the reponse works similarly to autosuggest on your
>>       telephone, but only on steroids
>>
>> Simon, many of the things you outline can be improved, and my hopes is
>> that they will be. "Software is never done, and if it were, then it would
>> be called 'hardware'." Again, thank you.
>>
>> P.S. This morning I created a different chatbot, and this time it is
>> rooted in the works of Jane Austen:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fe7053a831a40f92a86.gradio.live%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cselee%40CHAPMAN.EDU%7C9ed78d2f5823491ecf4d08dc6f81c825%7C809929af2d2545bf9837089eb9cfbd01%7C0%7C0%7C638507850416777211%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=SQXn7bohv0yY6xE2koE%2Fkjb94lvgzovTHAD%2F%2FcXNbZQ%3D&reserved=0<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fe7053a831a40f92a86.gradio.live%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cselee%40CHAPMAN.EDU%7C9ed78d2f5823491ecf4d08dc6f81c825%7C809929af2d2545bf9837089eb9cfbd01%7C0%7C0%7C638507850416788308%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QAjaKfQ46Oeqf5NwVhen7H3lPm2vc1XskIObmJfbNUw%3D&reserved=0><https://e7053a831a40f92a86.gradio.live/>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Morgan
>> University of Notre Dame
>>
> **** CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Hofstra University. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ****
>
> NOTE: This email originated from outside Chapman’s network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know content is safe.

-- 
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask]
http://kcoyle.net

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager