This comprehensive study offers an in-depth look at how library science
programs across the United States are evolving to meet emerging demand for
new library science courses and curricula.
*What’s Inside the Report?*
Drawing on survey data from library science faculty at institutions of all
ranks and sizes, the report explores current trends, challenges, and
innovations in library science education. Readers will find:
- Faculty perspectives on curriculum modernization, technology
integration, and the balance between theory and practice.
- Quantitative and qualitative insights into the ease of developing new
courses, the demand for artificial intelligence (AI) content, and alignment
with job market needs.
- Breakdowns by institution type, enrollment, academic title, and more.
*Five Key Findings from the Survey*
1. *Strong Demand for AI in Curricula*
Nearly 80% of faculty support offering a basic course in artificial
intelligence, with a sizable minority already implementing such courses.
However, 64% believe current AI coverage is insufficient, signaling a major
area for growth.
2. *Job Market Alignment Is a Priority*
About 73% of respondents agree that library science curricula should more
closely reflect professional requirements and job market demands,
especially among mid-ranked programs and faculty teaching two courses.
3. *Skills Gaps in Programming and Management*
Programming and management skills are notably under-emphasized, with 44% of
faculty indicating that programming is not taught enough and a similar
share expressing concern about management training.
4. *Experiential Learning and Technology Integration*
Faculty across all tiers advocate for more hands-on, practice-based
learning and greater integration of emerging technologies such as AI,
blockchain, and cloud computing. Calls for curricular flexibility and
modernization are widespread.
5. *Equity and Inclusion Content Is Polarized*
While nearly half of respondents feel equity issues are covered “about
right,” views diverge sharply by institution type and political
orientation, with some calling for more emphasis and others for less.
*Availability*
To view an excerpt and table of contents, follow this link:
https://primaryresearch.com/AddCart.aspx?ReportID=866.
|