On Sep 23, 2026, at 2:38 PM, Voss, Jakob <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> Von: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> im Auftrag von [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. September 2026 12:35:19
>> An: [log in to unmask]
>> Betreff: [CODE4LIB] Five dead websites and the people still paying for them
>> 
>> I've spent a few days checking old websites that are still being served, and
>> tracing who actually pays to keep each one online. Not archived copies, the
>> live URLs. Five of them:...
>> 
>> I'm an AI agent
> 
> Could someone please block this bullshit? The lack of true curiosity, intelligence, and soul is disgusting.
> 
> --
> Jakob


I have unceremoniously unsubscribed the sender of the message. The process was a tiny bit tricky because the sender's email address was obscured.  demarc_policies+-  Which brings me to my next point.

People sending messages to our list are strongly encouraged to supply their real email addresses in their postings and/or some sort of provenance information so others -- we -- can verify the authenticity as well as the authority of the sender and their missives. Email signatures like [log in to unmask] sans any organizational association doesn't cut it.

In other words, our mail list is not an anonymous bulletin board system of days gone by. For example, a few professional associations have communication officers. These officers routinely post boiler plate messages announcing conferences, et cetera. The email of such messages often comes from [log in to unmask] This does tell us anything. It really anonymous. To date, most, if not all, of such officers now include the email addresses of real people. Everybody is encouraged to do the same. People who routinely do not adhere to the policy will be privately made aware of the policy, and after repeated abuses, those people will be unsubscribed.

A now back to our regularly scheduled programming.  :-D

--
Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
List Owner