 |
 |
Thanks David, but another link on the same site you cite ;-) shows MS still up to their old tricks: http://news.com.com/Apache%2C+open-source+groups+wary+of+Sender+ID/2100-1013_3-5345317.html?tag=st.pop I hope the Apache folk stick to their guns on this. Thanks also for the "preview" plugin. Every little bit helps. David Huckleby wrote: > Due to the recent Lawsuit against Microsoft, > http://news.com.com/Will+Microsoft+tweak+IE%3F/2100-1012_3-5069943.html?tag=nl > > courtesy of /., many sites that only work with IE may have to change a > bit > and IE may even be changed. > > This link is to IE View. What it does: Adds "View page in Internet > Explorer" > links to the content and link context menu. Handy for previewing pages in > IE, loading up IE-only pages when you run across them in Mozilla, etc. > http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=35&vid=156 > > Hope this helps, > > David > >> From: Jeffrey Barnett <[log in to unmask]> >> Reply-To: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: [CODE4LIB] Pros and Cons of XUL development >> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:54:45 -0400 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Received: from pickering.cc.nd.edu ([129.74.250.225]) by >> mc6-f15.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 3 Sep >> 2004 >> 07:06:43 -0700 >> Received: from hazard (hazard.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.229])by >> pickering.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.6a/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id >> i83C4bHG013725;Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:54:48 -0500 (EST) >> Received: from LISTSERV.ND.EDU by LISTSERV.ND.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP >> release >> 1.8d) with spool id 10407169 for [log in to unmask]; >> Fri, 3 >> Sep 2004 08:54:48 -0500 >> Received: from pickering.cc.nd.edu (pickering.cc.nd.edu >> [129.74.250.225]) >> by hazard.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id >> i83DslrT029564 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 >> 08:54:47 -0500 (EST) >> Received: from pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu (pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu >> [130.132.50.34]) by pickering.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.6a/Switch-3.1.0) >> with ESMTP id i83Dskb8005962 for <[log in to unmask]>; >> Fri, 3 >> Sep 2004 08:54:46 -0500 (EST) >> Received: from [130.132.80.102] (systems13.library.yale.edu >> [130.132.80.102]) by pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu >> (8.12.11/8.12.11) >> with ESMTP id i83DskMj004147 for <[log in to unmask]>; >> Fri, >> 3 Sep 2004 09:54:46 -0400 >> X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jG+3ud4AyYVgWCjCNeftPqJ >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) >> Gecko/20040616 >> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en >> X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2a (attachment(s) not renamed) >> X-ND-MTA-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:55:16 -0500 (EST) >> X-ND-Virus-Scan: engine v4.3.20; dat v4389 >> Approved-By: Jeffrey Barnett <[log in to unmask]> >> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> >> Organization: Yale University Library >> Return-Path: [log in to unmask] >> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2004 14:06:44.0818 (UTC) >> FILETIME=[3E988320:01C491BF] >> >> I've been a Mozilla and more recently Firefox user for a long time, but >> only recently noticed the availability of extensions. (I know :") ) I'm >> really excited by the extensibility, but cautious about the tie-in to a >> single browser development environment. I know Microsoft ignores this >> all the time, and unfortunately I'm finding more and more sites that >> seem to *require* IE to use. My question is, even though the underlying >> XML is "open" and "standard", doesn't the use of XUL lead to the same >> sort of "lock out" for users of typical "public" services, such as >> libraries who frequently have no choice (or even knowledge) of which >> browser to use? >> >> Is there anything that can be done, or has been done, to take these >> great extensions, and the tools to create them and make them coexist >> with or "embrace and extend" the IE universe? > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools > and > more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx