On Feb 15, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Hickey,Thom wrote: > It seems to me that your version -would- be possible to generate from a > MARC record. Perhaps, but I would want to see: * The title as it was printed on the book, not this lowercase business * No "[electronic resource]" title field foolishness * No mixing of author/editor and the title as we presently do in the 245 field for some reason I still can't figure out We have more anachronistic practices in our catalogs than I think we fully appreciate. Roy