 |
 |
Roy, No easy solution to the lowercase problem. However, [electronic resource] is kept in a separate subfield, as is the statement of responsibility. Just don't use/display those particular subfields if you or your users find them ugly. Sincerely, David Bigwood [log in to unmask] Lunar & Planetary Institute -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Roy Tennant Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:37 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Formatting MARC records On Feb 15, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Hickey,Thom wrote: > It seems to me that your version -would- be possible to generate from a > MARC record. Perhaps, but I would want to see: * The title as it was printed on the book, not this lowercase business * No "[electronic resource]" title field foolishness * No mixing of author/editor and the title as we presently do in the 245 field for some reason I still can't figure out We have more anachronistic practices in our catalogs than I think we fully appreciate. Roy