Hi Jeff, I just took a look at the draft statement. It's a good start, and I like that you made it clear and simple. Under Purpose: In the first sentence, within the parentheses, you might mention "systems librarians" or "library analysts". I could not legitimately call myself any of the three technologist types listed, yet the journal will be very much for folks like me who carry c4lib info into other parts of our institutions. As well, technologists who sit on the MLS side of the technology, rather than the code side, should be mentioned specifically to demonstrate the educational objective discussed earlier, since we seem to have agreed that an aim is to encourage those not on the code side to do some learning. Otherwise, as mentioned before, it's coders talking only to coders. Something that needs to be included somewhere is a statement about rights management, authors' rights, copyright/left, etc., written by someone with a good understanding of Creative Commons licensing. (I'm not the right person to ask, or I would do a draft myself.) Cheers. Din. [log in to unmask] ** My own stuff above, as usual; not my employer's. ** > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Davis, Jeffrey > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 12:15 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] A code4lib journal proposal > > In an > attempt to create a "node" for formal publication, I've put > together the first draft of a formal statement of purpose, > format, and editorial policies for a code4lib journal. It's > on the code4lib wiki: > > http://wiki.library.oregonstate.edu/confluence/display/code4lib/code4lib+jou rnal+-+mission%2C+format%2C+guidelines > <snip>