On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:05:37AM -0500, Jonathan Gorman wrote: > I'm not a fan of the name either and didn't vote for it. Who really did vote for /lib/dev? Somebody please speak up and defend the choice. Are we sure there wasn't some ballot-stuffing going on? Is a recount in order? Where's the paper trail? I like plain old boring Code For Libraries myself (maybe with the same explanatory subtitle: A Journal for Library Programmers). That sounds to me like a journal that will be around for a while. gsf