 |
 |
Thanks, Thom, for solving this problem 20 years too late. -Ross. On 8/16/06, Hickey,Thom <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I see the problem. You really should have been using the (4,4) key for > searching. > > --Th > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Eric Lease Morgan > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:50 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] position announcement [retrospective conversion] > > On Aug 16, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: > > > The following position announcement from PALINET (Philadelphia, PA) > > was brought to my attention: > > > In an almost completely unrelated note, I worked for PALINET in 1986 > or so. My job was to read physical catalog cards all from a specific > library, search OCLC (4,2,2,1) for the best match, and then assign an > OCLC number to the card. I think I was helping with a retrospective > conversion process, and I remember I didn't do very well at the job. > Too much detail. > > -- > Eric Morgan > University Libraries of Notre Dame > >