 |
 |
Worldcat.org, as nice as it is, only offers a limited subset of bibliographic data. There's no way to get to the underlying MARC record, as far as I can see. Or am I missing something? -Keith On 9/5/06, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Why not use WorldCat.org? I believe that it already contains the > entire LC bibliographic data plus additional member input data not > found in the LC bibliographic data.