 |
 |
Regarding the pre-conference lucene and solr workshop 1. I am interested and scheduled to be there. 2. I like the half day lecture/half day hands on format best. It would be great if someone who has experience integrating lucene\solr with ruby on rails as well. 3. I can go either way with registration. Assuming my funding for the trip comes through, I will be there if it happens. Mike Beccaria Systems Librarian Paul Smith's College 518.327.6376 > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Bess Sadler > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:53 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [CODE4LIB] code4lib pre-conference: lucene and solr workshop > > Dear fellow code4libbers, > > In conjunction with the upcoming code4lib conference, we are trying > to organize a one day pre-conference event around lucene and solr. > (See http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html and http:// > incubator.apache.org/solr/ if you don't know what these words mean.) > Erik Hatcher, one of the authors of _Lucene in Action_ (http:// > lucenebook.com/) has volunteered to lead it. This is an exciting > opportunity for anyone who works with (or who wants to learn how to > work with) lucene and/or solr, a webservices wrapper for lucene. > > My questions for the code4lib ad-hocracy are: > > 1. How many participants would we have for such an event? Attending > would involve showing up for the conference a day early to > participate in a full-day event. Please email [log in to unmask] if > you would be interested in attending so we can gauge interest. The > number of people who want to attend will help to determine the answer > to question #2... > > 2. What kind of format would folks like to see for this event? If we > have 50 people or less, it has been suggested that we have a half day > lecture / half day hands-on workshop, where people bring their own > laptops and data sets and we try to get people up and running in > their own context and with their own data. Think old-school linux > install-fest meets Access hack-fest. Alternatively, if we have much > more interest, we could either do just a lecture / discussion, or > else we could break into groups if we can get more people to > volunteer to be helpers. Erik, justifiably, doesn't feel he can serve > as a hands-on advisor for 100 people. For the hands-on portion to > work with a large group, we would need a significant number of people > with wi-fi enabled computers to bring their equipment and their data, > as well as enough people with lucene/solr experience to help Erik > answer questions and troubleshoot. > > 3. Some folks on #code4lib feel that we should charge a registration > fee, and some folks feel that we should not. The arguments in favor > of a reg fee (think around $20) are that without a financial > commitment people sometimes sign up for a workshop and then don't > attend. Also, with a reg fee we could provide coffee / donuts / > whatever. Arguments against a reg fee are that the conference > organizers might not want to deal with it, we like to keep things as > free and bureaucracy-free as possible, and since the room isn't > costing us $$ and Erik is volunteering his time (everyone remember to > buy Erik a drink when you see him) why charge $$ if we aren't paying $ > $? For what it's worth I was originally in favor of charging > registration, but I have now changed my mind since Erik assures me he > does not expect to be compensated (with money, that is. I'm sure > he'll be getting lots of whuffie.) > > Please respond to [log in to unmask] to be counted in the tally for > question #1, and please respond to the list to discuss questions #2 > and #3. > > Thank you! > > Bess > > > > Elizabeth (Bess) Sadler > Head, Technical and Metadata Services > Digital Scholarship Services > Box 400129 > Alderman Library > University of Virginia > Charlottesville, VA 22904 > > [log in to unmask] > (434) 243-2305 > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged Information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or reply via e-mail and destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. Thank you. <<<<GWAVAsig>>>>