 |
 |
On Jan 23, 2008 6:34 PM, Doran, Michael D <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'm wondering if we'll soon reach the point where the perl4lib list is not worth subscribing to. I'm not looking for any definitive answer here... I guess I'm just a little sad to see an old favorite lose its relevance. :-/ Don't be sad :-) The code4lib list came into existence because a bunch of people on the perl4lib list (and elsewhere) realized tat talking about libraries and programming only in the scope of perl was too limiting...and the proliferation of *4lib discussions was an anti-pattern of sorts. I think in hindsight this was the right decision to make, considering the conference and everything. //Ed