 |
 |
Hi Eric, > I suppose I am guilty party here... It wasn't in any way my intention to point an accusatory finger at anybody! > ...and I posted to code4lib because it seems to be a > more vibrant community. Oh, without a doubt, that is the case. > Moreover, people who do not program in Perl may have additional > observations to bear. Also quite true. I imagine that there's significant overlap in subscribers for the two lists, and I don't think any of us want people to start cross-posting every perl question to both lists. But if people are choosing to post perl stuff just to code4lib (and I can't argue with the reasons above), I'm wondering if we'll soon reach the point where the perl4lib list is not worth subscribing to. I'm not looking for any definitive answer here... I guess I'm just a little sad to see an old favorite lose its relevance. :-/ -- Michael # Michael Doran, Systems Librarian # University of Texas at Arlington # 817-272-5326 office # 817-688-1926 mobile # [log in to unmask] # http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Eric Lease Morgan > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:06 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions > > On Jan 23, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote: > > > There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant > > postings... > > I suppose I am guilty party here, and I posted to code4lib > because it seems to be a more vibrant community. Moreover, > people who do not program in Perl may have additional > observations to bear. > > -- > Eric Lease Morgan >