 |
 |
Cloutman, David wrote: > The only problem is that if you pass a bad URL (i.e. for an invalid LC > Card number, the resulting page for either MARC XML or human readable > view gives you a response code of 200 instead of 404. This means that if > you're basing functionality in your application to grab the data from > one of these URLs, you'll have to write a bunch of funky logic rather > than relying on the http standard. > > Definitely a step in the right direction, but it needs tweaking. This is great feedback. I hope you'll consider sending it back through to the developers of this service using the link provided in the FAQ in addition to sharing your thoughts here. :) -Dan