 |
 |
s/customer/"partner"/ Also, in the case of what the thread was initially calling for, what would be the legalities of redistributing this data? -Ross. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you need to be an OCLC > customer to benefit from this? > > -Ross. > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >>> Ross Singer >>> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 7:45 PM >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data >>> >>> Also, I noticed another dump on the IA of Library of Congress updates >>> since the initial "Bisson load". >>> http://www.archive.org/details/marc_loc_updates >>> >>> In typical IA fashion, it's incredibly difficult to know what the hell >>> this stuff is, though. >>> -Ross. >> >> If you just looking for access to the LCSH authority data, you can access it through our Terminology Services project. The data in our SRW server was updated to the 2008-09-17 weekly update from LC. The SRW server is located at the URI: >> >> <http://tspilot.oclc.org/lcsh/> >> >> Looking for access to other authority files: >> >> FAST <http://tspilot.oclc.org/fast/> >> GSAFD <http://tspilot.oclc.org/gsafd/> >> MeSH <http://tspilot.oclc.org/mesh/> >> TGM I <http://tspilot.oclc.org/lctgm/> >> TGM II <http://tspilot.oclc.org/gmgpc/> >> >> >> Andy. >> >