 |
 |
Stephens, Owen wrote: > > I'll have a look - this does seem to be the kind of thing I'm thinking > of. > I think that actually we might find that RDA looked much simpler (and it > could hardly look more complex) if we did manage to express it as a DSP > plus DC-Text representation plus usage guidelines. Clearly it would also > allow us to take advantage of the vocab lists you have already created > and integrate them back into the documentation > To some extent, the Online RDA product is doing some of this. It re-organizes the RDA text using linking, and I will be very interested to see how that works. It also has the capability (I believe) to use the vocabulary lists and elements that we've defined. I don't think the initial version will actually implement this, but I don't know for sure. kc -- ----------------------------------- Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant [log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet fx.: 510-848-3913 mo.: 510-435-8234 ------------------------------------