 |
 |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Alexander Johannesen <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I wasn't asking for technical reasons; I was more having a stab at how > many people use and need MARCXML specifically as compared to a number > of other more used formats. I mean, seriously, you can use MARCXML > embedded in Atom and get the best of both worlds instead. > You could, and we do (http://jangle.org/) and it would be immensely helpful to put it in: <content type="application/marcxml+xml"><record>...</record></content> rather than: <content type="application/xml"><record>...</record></content> to know that's what's being transported (without having to know Jangle's extensions). -Ross.