 |
 |
Aha, cool! Yeah, I could use tag for this, but it wouldn't seem appropriate for something I want to encourage others to use compatibly as well, info seems better. Houghton,Andrew wrote: >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >> Jonathan Rochkind >> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 4:52 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? >> >> Also, the date aspect of a tag-uri seems to make it hard to use to mint >> an identifier that will always represent the same SuDoc, regardless of >> when it was minted. >> > > No the date part is a versioning scheme, not the date you created the > tag URI. It's used, for example, where I created a specific tag > scheme one day and then decided to create another tag scheme some > other day: > > tag:example.org,1999:date/yy-mm-dd > > where yy-mm-dd is the year, month and day values. Then I realize that > it's Y2K so I create a new tag scheme: > > tag:example.org,2000:date/yyyy-mm-dd > > > Andy. >