 |
 |
Ross Singer writes: > There should be no issue with having both, mainly because like I > mentioned earlier, nobody cares about info:uris. > > Take, for instance, DOIs. What do you see in the wild? Do you ever > see info:uris (except in OpenURLs)? If you don't see > http://dx.doi.org/ URIs you generally see doi:10... URIs. It seems > like having http and info URIs would *have* to be fine, since > info:uris *not being dereferenceable* are far less useful (I won't go > so far as 'useless') on the web, which is where all this is happening. What on earth does dereferencing have to do with this? We're talking about an identifier. _/|_ ___________________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ You can never go back -- only forwards, or stand still.