Print

Print


My point is that I don't see how they're different in practice.

And one of them actually allowed you to do something from your email client.

-Ross.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ross, I don't get your point. My point was about the confusion between two
> things that begin: http:// but that are very different in practice. What's
> yours?
>
> kc
>
> Ross Singer wrote:
>>
>> Your email client knew what do with:
>>
>> info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00728.x ?
>>
>> doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00728.x ?
>>
>> Or did you recognize the info:doi scheme and Google it?
>>
>> Or would this, in case of 99% of the world, just look like gibberish
>> or part of some nerd's PGP key?
>>
>> -Ross.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ross Singer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But shouldn't we be able to know the difference between an identifier
>>>>> and
>>>>> a
>>>>> locator? Isn't that the problem here? That you don't know which it is
>>>>> if
>>>>> it
>>>>> starts with http://.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But you do if it starts with http://dx.doi.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, *I* don't. And neither does my email program, since it displayed it
>>> as a
>>> URL (blue and underlined). That's inside knowledge, not part of the
>>> technology. Someone COULD create a web site at that address, and there's
>>> nothing in the URI itself to tell me if it's a URI or a URL.
>>>
>>> The general convention is that "http://" is a web address, a location. I
>>> realize that it's also a form of URI, but that's a minority use of http.
>>> This leads to a great deal of confusion. I understand the desire to use
>>> domain names as a way to create unique, managed identifiers, but the http
>>> part is what is causing us problems.
>>>
>>> John Kunze's ARK system attempted to work around this by using http to
>>> retrieve information about the URI, so you're not just left guessing.
>>> It's
>>> not a question of resolution, but of giving you a short list of things
>>> that
>>> you can learn about a URI that begins with http. However, again, unless
>>> you
>>> know the secret you have no idea that those particular URI/Ls have that
>>> capability. So again we're going beyond the technology into some human
>>> knowledge that has to be there to take advantage of the capabilities. It
>>> doesn't seem so far fetched to make it possible for programs (dumb, dumb
>>> programs) to know the difference between an identifier and a location
>>> based
>>> on something universal, like a prefix, without having to be coded for
>>> dozens
>>> or hundreds of exceptions.
>>>
>>> kc
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I still don't see the difference.  The same logic that would be
>>>> required to parse and understand the info: uri scheme could be used to
>>>> apply towards an http uri scheme.
>>>>
>>>> -Ross.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
>>> [log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net
>>> ph.: 510-540-7596   skype: kcoylenet
>>> fx.: 510-848-3913
>>> mo.: 510-435-8234
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------
> Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
> [log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net
> ph.: 510-540-7596   skype: kcoylenet
> fx.: 510-848-3913
> mo.: 510-435-8234
> ------------------------------------
>