 |
 |
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >> Brett Bonfield >> >> However, just to be clear, rev=canonical != rel=canonical. >> >> They are discrete responses to distinct issues. > > Agreed. Another issue with rev=canonical is that I don't believe that > rev= is going to be supported in HTML 5. That's correct. As a couple of the posts I pointed to mention, the current plan isn't simply to deprecate rev (and then explain why rev has been deprecated) but to omit it completely. Brett