"sexy groovy" - 43,200 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Hankinson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Just out of curiosity I tried them in quotes: > > "sexy ruby" - 72,200 > "sexy python" - 37,900 > "sexy php" - 25,100 > "sexy java" - 16,100 > "sexy asp" - 14,800 > "sexy perl" - 8,080 > "sexy C++" - 177 > "sexy FORTRAN" - 67 > "sexy COBOL" - 8 > > I tried "sexy lisp" but the results were skewed by speech impediment fetishes. Which I'd say is even less strange than 8 people thinking you can write sexy COBOL. > > On 2010-03-25, at 10:20 PM, Tim Spalding wrote: > >>> Finally, I never would have put the strings "PHP" and "sexiness" in a sentence together (though I guess I just did). >> >> A simple Google search shows how very wrong you are: >> >> "sexy php" - 56,100,000 results >> "sexy asp" - 8,380,000 >> "sexy java" - 6,360,000 >> "sexy ruby" - 2,840,000 >> "sexy perl" - 532,000 >> "sexy C++" - 488,000 >> "sexy smalltalk" - 113,000 >> "sexy fortran" - 107,000 >> "sexy COBOL" - 58,100 >> >> There are also very high results for "sexy logo." Perhaps, since I was >> in fourth grade, someone's figured out something interesting to do >> with that stupid turtle! >> >> Tim >