 |
 |
"sexy code4lib" - 0 (with quotes); 2,380 (without quotes) Thanks, Becky "sexy librarian" - 73,700... "sexy coder" - 1,950... On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > "sexy groovy" - 43,200 > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Hankinson > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity I tried them in quotes: > > > > "sexy ruby" - 72,200 > > "sexy python" - 37,900 > > "sexy php" - 25,100 > > "sexy java" - 16,100 > > "sexy asp" - 14,800 > > "sexy perl" - 8,080 > > "sexy C++" - 177 > > "sexy FORTRAN" - 67 > > "sexy COBOL" - 8 > > > > I tried "sexy lisp" but the results were skewed by speech impediment > fetishes. Which I'd say is even less strange than 8 people thinking you can > write sexy COBOL. > > > > On 2010-03-25, at 10:20 PM, Tim Spalding wrote: > > > >>> Finally, I never would have put the strings "PHP" and "sexiness" in a > sentence together (though I guess I just did). > >> > >> A simple Google search shows how very wrong you are: > >> > >> "sexy php" - 56,100,000 results > >> "sexy asp" - 8,380,000 > >> "sexy java" - 6,360,000 > >> "sexy ruby" - 2,840,000 > >> "sexy perl" - 532,000 > >> "sexy C++" - 488,000 > >> "sexy smalltalk" - 113,000 > >> "sexy fortran" - 107,000 > >> "sexy COBOL" - 58,100 > >> > >> There are also very high results for "sexy logo." Perhaps, since I was > >> in fourth grade, someone's figured out something interesting to do > >> with that stupid turtle! > >> > >> Tim > > >