 |
 |
Google code has project feeds in Atom, too. --Dave ================== David Walker Library Web Services Manager California State University http://xerxes.calstate.edu ________________________________________ From: Code for Libraries [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Aaron Rubinstein [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:21 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] newbie On 3/25/2010 12:47 PM, Ross Singer wrote: > I disagreed with this back in the day, and I still disagree with > running our own code repository. There are too many good code hosting > solutions out there for this to be justifiable. We used to run an SVN > repo at code4lib.org, but we never bothered rebuilding it after our > server got hacked. > > Actually I think GitHub/Google Code and their ilk are a much better > solution -- especially for pastebins/gists/etc. What would be useful, > though, is an aggregation of the Code4lib's community spread across > these sites, sort of what like the Planet does for blog postings, etc. > or what Google Buzz does for the people I follow (i.e. I see their > gists). > > I'd buy in to that (and help support it), but I'm not sure how one > would go about it. > > -Ross. I think the old discussion was looking more for a way to host code snippets as opposed to version controlled projects, which I agree that GitHub and the like already do nicely. Would we really need more than a code4lib.pastebin.com? That being said, a code planet would be really cool. I know that GitHub and BitBucket publish ATOM feeds of a user's activity but I'm not so sure about other code hosting sites. Anyways, just a thought... Aaron