 |
 |
+1 for New Haven (if not for 2011, then for 2012). Daniel, feel free to give me a shout if you'd like any help putting together the proposal! Mark A. Matienzo Digital Archivist, Manuscripts and Archives Yale University Library On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Lovins, Daniel <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Well, I've been meaning to toss New Haven, CT, into the ring, but was waiting to get more feedback/expressions of interest from my colleagues here (and also thinking that 2012 might be better for East Coast). > > Anyway, I can try to have a skeletal proposal ready by the 5th (unless someone at Yale tries to talk me out of it). > Daniel > > On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote: > >> SIDEBAR: >> >> Granted "these economic times," but am I the only one who's surprised >> not to hear more interest in hosting next year's conference? Yes, >> yes, we're a bunch of damned procrastinators, I know. >> >> -Mike >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 21:41, William Denton <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> On 2 March 2010, Ziso, Ya'aqov wrote: >>> >>>> Many institutions would consider Canada an international conference, and >>>> most likely would allow (if any!?) one. My 5 cents (and that's all left in >>>> the budget), >>> >>> s/Many/Many American/ but I know what you mean. I don't see a local chapter >>> meeting as conflicting with the full conference, and don't think that's >>> anything to worry about. >>> >>> I'd like to go to Vancouver for a Code4Lib---it's certainly easy for me to >>> get to, from Toronto, and I won't have the difficulties and anxieties that >>> come from travelling into the US---but I hope some small to mid-size >>> American cities put in too. Providence and Asheville were great to visit. >>> >>> Bill >>> -- >>> William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org >>> >