 |
 |
OCLC++ We will gladly suffer Roy Tennant's presence in exchange for continuing support. -Mike P.S. But seriously: OCLC++ On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:10, Tim Shearer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > A big old thank you to OCLC for the support! It is deeply appreciated. > > -t > > On 3/3/10 10:34 AM, Roy Tennant wrote: >> >> On 3/3/10 3/3/10 € 7:22 AM, "Ross Singer"<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Paul Joseph<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>> No need to be concerned about the vendors: they're the same suspects who >>>> sponsored C4L10. >>> >>> Just to be clear on this -- the same suspects actually shelled out far >>> less for C4L10 than they had in the past. >> >> Just to clarify the clarification, OCLC continued our support at the >> highest >> level this year, as we have since the conference began. >> Roy >