 |
 |
We tried to get some of the ILS's interested...with little success. But how knows...I did some heavy promotion to III this year...(despite the many "--"s, she promised to talk to headquarters) so perhaps they might help some next year... Jill -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Joseph Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:56 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2011 Proposals No need to be concerned about the vendors: they're the same suspects who sponsored C4L10. Paul On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > .... also, I can assure you that to help keep registration fees low we'll > be > leaning on our vendors ... > ========= > Who would be these vendors? Seems CODE4LIB (bringing in creative, leading > edge, OpenSource ideas where ILS have monolithically reigned) are the bad > dream of ILS vendors. WorldCat DeveNet/Research may make an exception, but > will it be $$$$$ufficient? > Yašaqov >