 |
 |
After seeing some of the cool things people can do with other ILS's and how negative developers are about III, there's always the chance they might decide to open up a bit more and engage with code4lib types (we can always dream). And if that doesn't work, maybe the Ian Walls' talk (Becoming Truly Innovative: Migrating from Millennium to Koha) will motivate them... -Esme -- Esme Cowles <[log in to unmask]> "They extend copyrights perpetually. They don't get how that in itself is a form of theft." -- Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Jill Ellern wrote: > We tried to get some of the ILS's interested...with little success. But how knows...I did some heavy promotion to III this year...(despite the many "--"s, she promised to talk to headquarters) so perhaps they might help some next year... > > Jill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Joseph > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:56 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2011 Proposals > > No need to be concerned about the vendors: they're the same suspects who > sponsored C4L10. > Paul > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> .... also, I can assure you that to help keep registration fees low we'll >> be >> leaning on our vendors ... >> ========= >> Who would be these vendors? Seems CODE4LIB (bringing in creative, leading >> edge, OpenSource ideas where ILS have monolithically reigned) are the bad >> dream of ILS vendors. WorldCat DeveNet/Research may make an exception, but >> will it be $$$$$ufficient? >> Yašaqov >>