 |
 |
-1 on removing delicious --jay On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jodi Schneider <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of this is one > of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for me to > pinboard.in). > > I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody wants to > take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have... > > -Jodi > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael J. Giarlo < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Reasonable arguments. The nice thing is that if delicious is removed, >> you can just subscribe to: >> >> http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib >> >> Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's stewardship. >> :) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a distraction; I >> can already track that elsewhere.) >> >> -Mike >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:35, Rosalyn Metz <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> > I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share articles >> we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I would hate >> for that medium to disappear. >> > >> > Rosalyn >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> >> > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:25:07 >> > To: <[log in to unmask]> >> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR >> > >> > I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I >> > think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything >> > code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go >> > and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the >> > majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me. >> > >> > >> > ranti. >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >> +1 to all that as well >> >> >> >> Kevin >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo >> >> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> +1 to removing flickr >> >>> +1 to removing delicious as well >> >>> +1 to jrochkind using his discretion >> >>> >> >>> -Mike >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >>>> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet. >> >>>> >> >>>> CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case >> (on >> >>>> list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the >> planet >> >>>> I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had >> the >> >>>> same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for it >> before >> >>>> doing it. :) ). >> >>>> >> >>>> [Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1) Someone could add >> a >> >>>> link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home page, >> perhaps >> >>>> under 'photos'. 2) If you happen to know that there are a bunch of >> photos >> >>>> at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the _search >> >>>> results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr. Delicious tag code4lib is >> still on >> >>>> the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo, or we'll >> be >> >>>> back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought of. ] >> >>>> >> >>>> Jonathan >> >>>> >> >>>> Eric Lease Morgan wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on flickr >> are >> >>>>>> playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the bend. >> Would it >> >>>>>> be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at least, >> if photos >> >>>>>> must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed >> readers >> >>>>>> don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at >> least >> >>>>>> that many in these past few days. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan >> >>>>> Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> will be able to help... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Bulk mail. Postage paid. >> > >> >