Jay Luker wrote: > -1 on removing delicious > > --jay > If anyone is counting: removing_delicious-- Edward > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jodi Schneider <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of this is one >> of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for me to >> pinboard.in). >> >> I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody wants to >> take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have... >> >> -Jodi >> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael J. Giarlo < >> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> >>> Reasonable arguments. The nice thing is that if delicious is removed, >>> you can just subscribe to: >>> >>> http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib >>> >>> Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's stewardship. >>> :) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a distraction; I >>> can already track that elsewhere.) >>> >>> -Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:35, Rosalyn Metz <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share articles >>>> >>> we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I would hate >>> for that medium to disappear. >>> >>>> Rosalyn >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> >>>> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:25:07 >>>> To: <[log in to unmask]> >>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR >>>> >>>> I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I >>>> think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything >>>> code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go >>>> and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the >>>> majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me. >>>> >>>> >>>> ranti. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> +1 to all that as well >>>>> >>>>> Kevin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo >>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 to removing flickr >>>>>> +1 to removing delicious as well >>>>>> +1 to jrochkind using his discretion >>>>>> >>>>>> -Mike >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> >>>>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case >>>>>>> >>> (on >>> >>>>>>> list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the >>>>>>> >>> planet >>> >>>>>>> I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had >>>>>>> >>> the >>> >>>>>>> same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for it >>>>>>> >>> before >>> >>>>>>> doing it. :) ). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1) Someone could add >>>>>>> >>> a >>> >>>>>>> link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home page, >>>>>>> >>> perhaps >>> >>>>>>> under 'photos'. 2) If you happen to know that there are a bunch of >>>>>>> >>> photos >>> >>>>>>> at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the _search >>>>>>> results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr. Delicious tag code4lib is >>>>>>> >>> still on >>> >>>>>>> the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo, or we'll >>>>>>> >>> be >>> >>>>>>> back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought of. ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Eric Lease Morgan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on flickr >>>>>>>>> >>> are >>> >>>>>>>>> playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the bend. >>>>>>>>> >>> Would it >>> >>>>>>>>> be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at least, >>>>>>>>> >>> if photos >>> >>>>>>>>> must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed >>>>>>>>> >>> readers >>> >>>>>>>>> don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at >>>>>>>>> >>> least >>> >>>>>>>>> that many in these past few days. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan >>>>>>>> Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> will be able to help... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bulk mail. Postage paid. >>>> >>>>