 |
 |
I would rather see mail go to the main mailing list, to avoid fragmentation. I propose using naming conventions to help people filter. e.g. [LOCAL] Code4LibNorth or [LOCAL] MDV Otherwise, I'll *never* figure out what's going on anywhere. YMMV. -Jodi On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:54 PM, LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > *Red Letter Day!* :-) > > I agree with Mike. > > Ralph > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > > Mike Taylor > > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:33 AM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Sub-mailing lists > > > > For whatever little it may be worth, I'm finding that the (to me) > > noise on this list is greatly outweighing the signal at the moment, > > because of all the regional stuff. I'd welcome a splitting of the > > list. > > > > > > On 8 April 2010 13:28, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > I have no preference whether the planning discussions for regional > > > meetings would be conducted on code4lib or code4lib-[regional]. If the > > > regional group decides to have their own list, I do appreciate the > > > occasional shout-outs about it on the code4lib. > > > > > > Moreover, discussions for regionals that are located in a country > > > where official language is not English, it would probably easier for > > > those groups to have their own list. > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > ranti. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Bulk mail. Postage paid. > > > > > > >