 |
 |
I vote (heh) for "d" which will look a lot like "c" anyway, but with smatterings of owl:sameAs and Range-14 style 303's to keep things interesting. :) -- President BigBlueHat P: 864.232.9553 W: http://www.bigbluehat.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung On 4/29/10 2:01 PM, Jakob Voss wrote: > How about a bet instead of voting. In three years will there be: > > a) No relevant Twitter annotations anyway > b) Twitter annotations but not used much for bibliographic data > c) A rich variety of incompatible bibliographic annotation standards > d) Semantic Web will have solved every problem anyway