On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Tim Spalding <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Unless someone can come up with a perfect pre-cooked format—one that
> not only covers what we need but is also super easy and
> space-efficient (we have only 1/2k to use!)—Why don't we just decide
> on:
>
> 'simplebib' : {
>
> }
>
> and start filling in fields.
Because I don't think we've decided anything. I for one don't think we
should have yet another arbitrary citation format floating around the
Web.
Mark A. Matienzo
Digital Archivist, Manuscripts and Archives
Yale University Library
