 |
 |
Wait, I'm so confused. Is SRU 2.0 actually a published standard, or are you just showing us a work in progress that nobody should be writing code to yet? I'm confused because I thought it was just a draft work in progress, but then you talk about official vs unofficial copies... an unofficial copy of a draft work in progress that isn't a spec yet anyway? Very confused. If I'm planning on writing software to SRU... do you recommend I use the (until now not publically available so I didn't have a choice) "unofficial" SRU 2.0 thing, or is that still just a draft work in progress nobody should be writing software to yet? Jonathan Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > For those of you who have recently asked about current OASIS drafts of SRU > (2.0) and CQL ... > > The *official* versions reside at OASIS, but because of confusing (and > sometimes inaccessible) links, as well as uncertainty about status > (because of imbedded dates), we now maintain *unofficial copies* of the > most current versions at: > > http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/sru-2-0.doc > http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/cql.doc > > We will continue to maintain copies of the most current version at these > URLs. > > --Ray > >