 |
 |
I believe last I heard the SRU list was a private list that you had to be a member of OASIS and on the SRU committee to access. If that is no longer the case, then please do send me instructions on how to join this list, I would very much like to see what's going on in SRU. If you want people in the larger world to keep up with this stuff, you have to start doing it in less secretive means. I would very much like to be on the SRU list, but I am not willing to join any committees or be on any conference calls. Jonathan Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > Sorry for any confusion. SRU 2.0 is not a published standard, it is > currently a work in progress. (Whether you should be writing code to it is > a question that I suggest you take to the SRU list. The draft is mature > enough now that it is a reasonable question to discuss. There are people > writing code to it.) > > OASIS wants to be sure that official copies (and they use that term, > "official", whether referring to an approved spec or a draft) reside on > their server. So the copies at LC must be called *unofficial copies* of > the draft (or the spec, when it becomes approved). Again, sorry for the > confusion. > > --Ray > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jonathan Rochkind" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:17 PM > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts > > > >> Wait, I'm so confused. Is SRU 2.0 actually a published standard, or are >> you just showing us a work in progress that nobody should be writing code >> to yet? >> >> I'm confused because I thought it was just a draft work in progress, but >> then you talk about official vs unofficial copies... an unofficial copy of >> a draft work in progress that isn't a spec yet anyway? Very confused. >> >> If I'm planning on writing software to SRU... do you recommend I use the >> (until now not publically available so I didn't have a choice) >> "unofficial" SRU 2.0 thing, or is that still just a draft work in progress >> nobody should be writing software to yet? >> >> Jonathan >> >> Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: >> >>> For those of you who have recently asked about current OASIS drafts of >>> SRU (2.0) and CQL ... >>> >>> The *official* versions reside at OASIS, but because of confusing (and >>> sometimes inaccessible) links, as well as uncertainty about status >>> (because of imbedded dates), we now maintain *unofficial copies* of the >>> most current versions at: >>> >>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/sru-2-0.doc >>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/cql.doc >>> >>> We will continue to maintain copies of the most current version at these >>> URLs. >>> >>> --Ray >>> >>> >>> > >